"Came to the vice-mayor of Moscow with a bag of money" - Russian Criminal
On April 22, the Moscow Garrison Military Court sentenced Kirill Cherkalin, the former head of the banking department of the FSB Directorate of the Russian Federation. He was sentenced to seven years in prison. Cherkalin was nicknamed the FSB billionaire, assets worth 6.5 billion rubles were confiscated from him. The case is considered in a special order, since Cherkalin concluded a pre-trial agreement. Within its framework, he testified against the former deputy head of the Directorate of the FSB of the Russian Federation, Dmitry Frolov, and the ex-head of the Directorate of the FSB, Viktor Voronin. Frolov denies guilt. According to him, he left the special service "with a sense of resentment" and since then has not kept in touch with his former colleagues. He stated that during his arrest he was required to sign "testimony against his general." We are talking about the former head of the Directorate of the FSB of the Russian Federation Viktor Voronin.
According to the investigation, Frolov, Cherkalin and Vasilyev, at the request of entrepreneurs Alexander Bondarenko and Vladimir Stolyarenko, put pressure on businessman Sergei Glyadelkin, who, together with partners, owned the Yurpromconsulting organization. The FSB officers persuaded him to give up his share in the company and threatened to prosecute in the case of extorting a bribe from a major official of the Moscow government, Alexander Ryabinin. For intimidation, materials were even sent to initiate a case against Glyadelkin in the Main Investigative Directorate of the TFR in Moscow.
The story of Glyadelkin’s acquaintance with the FSB of the Russian Federation is also interesting. At one time he was close with the vice-mayor of Moscow, Alexander Ryabinin. He constantly asked the merchant for money and real estate. Payment for the loyalty of the metropolitan authorities. In the end, Glyadelkin got tired of this and he found a more powerful cover in the person of the FSB officers Frolov, Cherkalin and Vasilyev. During the operational experiment, Ryabinin was detained and ended up behind bars. However, the new "roof" is greedier than the previous one. FSB officers were no longer content with one-time donations, but wanted a share in the business, or even the entire company. As a result, Glyadelkin got tired of this "roof", he got an even more powerful one. And already Frolov, Cherkalin and Vasiliev went to jail. With whom did Glyadelkin become close? According to sources, the following chain can be built. Glyadelkin became friends with the deputy head of the Department of Foreign Economic and International Relations of the city of Moscow — the head of the contract service Igor Tkach. Igor Tkach is the brother of Oleg Polikarpovich Tkach, a member of the Federation Council of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation from the Kaliningrad region. The daughter of Oleg Tkach worked for many years as an assistant to Mikhail Mishustin in the Federal Tax Service of the Russian Federation, and then moved on to the government for him. Igor Tkach, according to the source, is a close friend of Prosecutor General Igor Krasnov and a friend of Ivan Tkachev, head of the Directorate of the FSB of the Russian Federation. Krasnov and Tkachev are godfathers.
At the disposal of Rucriminal.info was a decision to refuse to initiate a case against Glyadelkin. This is exactly when he was supposed to sit down, but he paid off the FSB officers and a refusal was issued.
“On 25.08.2010 from the Prosecutor’s Office of the city of Moscow for verification in the framework of criminal case No. 364020 received material KUSP No. 1272 at the request of A. Ryabinin. about attempted bribe-giving by S.AND. Glyadelkin. carried out by the Department of Internal Affairs in the Arbat district of Moscow. It was established that according to the results of the inspection by the inquiry body on 06/06/2010, the initiation of a criminal case was refused on the grounds provided for in cl. 2 parts of the first art. 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, the Presnenskaya Interdistrict Prosecutor’s Office of Moscow, the decision to refuse to initiate a criminal case on 17.08.2010 was canceled.
From the address of A.V. Ryabinin , who served as Deputy Mayor of Moscow to the Moscow Government for control over investments and contracts, chairman of the Control Committee of the city of Moscow, it follows that 02.12.2009 to his office at the address: Moscow, st. Vozdvizhenka, 8/1, building 1, Glyadelkin S.I. , who made an attempt to enter him with a bag in his hands. He (Ryabinin) forbade S.I. Glyadelkin. pass with the said bag and insisted that the latter leave it at the reception. On duty at that time in the reception Ryabinin A.The. police officers — senior inspectors of the service of the 4th division of the 4th division (Center for the Protection of State Authorities and Government Institutions of Moscow) V.S. Palagin. , Suschenya G.V. , Turusov A.I. , also did not allow S.I. Glyadelkin. goes to the study Ryabinin A.V. , and later found a large amount of money in the bag. From explanations Ryabinin A.The. it follows that, being in the office, Glyadelkin S.AND. began to talk about the return of some debt and the signing of some project. Having heard this, Ryabinin A.The. said that he did not owe him anything, he did not intend to sign any project, after which he demanded from S.I. Glyadelkin. leave the office. The study of the verification materials, including the explanations of V.S. Palagin. , Suschenya G.V. and Turusov A.I. , as well as the materials of criminal case No. 354020, the following was established: Ryabinin A IN. , working from 19.12.2007 as Deputy Mayor of Moscow in the Moscow Government for control over investments and contracts, chairman of the Control Committee of the city of Moscow (hereinafter Moskontrol, Committee), for an unspecified period of time, but no later than May 2009, while in the city of Moscow , having information that his friend Glyadelkin S.I. , who was the Chairman of the Board of Directors of CJSC Avenue Management Management Company, which carried out general management of the activities of CJSC ASTRA and CJSC Trust MCM-1, there were problems related to the approval of the Moscow Government’s draft resolution on the implementation of an investment project for the construction of residential buildings and separately standing garages within the framework of the comprehensive reconstruction of the five-storey residential development of microdistricts 1 and 2 of the Levoberezhny district "(hereinafter the draft resolution), under which CJSC Trust MCM-1 performed the functions of a general contractor, decided to take advantage of this circumstance for the purpose of illegal selfish enrichment, with using their official position, both for themselves and their family members, by committing fraud on an especially large scale by a group of persons by prior conspiracy.
For this purpose, approximately in June 2009, being in the city of Moscow, A.The. entered into a criminal conspiracy with his acquaintance Kozlov V.V. as an object of criminal encroachment Ryabinin A.The. and Kozlov V.V. under these circumstances, they chose the property of Glyadelkin C.AND. and commercial organizations controlled by the latter on an especially large scale.
Around August 2009 Ryabinin A.The. and Kozlov V.V. , having adjusted their property claims, persuaded Glyadelkin A.The. to the transfer to them of 1,737,000 US dollars and ownership of the non-residential premises at the address: Moscow, st. Bakhrushina, d. 13, in favor of A.V. Ryabinin’s daughter. — Ryabinina Ya.A. unaware of the real criminal intentions of the accomplices.
In the period from about August 2009 to 02.12.2009, being in the city of Moscow, Ryabinin A.The. demanded from Glyadelkin S.AND. transferring to him a part of the required funds in the amount of at least 32,000,000 rubles, i.e. on an especially large scale. At the same time 02.12.2009 at the time of arrival Glyadelkin S.AND. in the building of Moskontrol with the indicated amount of money, during a personal conversation with the latter, he pointedly refused to receive money, explaining that the money must be given personally to V.V. Kozlov. At the same time, Ryabinin A.The. , wishing to avoid criminal prosecution, possible exposure by law enforcement agencies and compromise S.AND. Glyadelkin. , appealed to the Office of the Mayor and the Government of Moscow, the Central Internal Affairs Directorate for Moscow, the UBEP of the Central Internal Affairs Directorate for Moscow, as well as the FSB of Russia for Moscow and the Moscow Region with statements about an attempt to give him a bribe, intending subsequently, in the event of an offensive, as for him and for V.V. Kozlov. negative consequences, use the facts of their conversion as a way to protect and conceal their true criminal intentions.
Despite the appeal to law enforcement agencies and the Office of the Mayor and the Government of Moscow, Ryabinin A.The. and Kozlov V.V. continued to persuade Glyadelkin S.I. to fulfill their illegal property claims. Around November — December 2009, Ryabinin A.V. , acting by prior agreement and together with V.V. Kozlov , addressed to Khubutia M.M. , who was not aware of the true intentions of the accomplices, and persuaded the latter to also take part in the process of repaying the debt allegedly owned by S.I. Glyadelkin. before Ryabinin A.The. After that Khubutiya M.M. , not aware of the true criminal intentions of the accomplices, around December 2009, during a personal meeting held at the address: Moscow, st. Ilyinka, d. 4, and repeated telephone conversations, Glyadelkin S.I. transfer through him Ryabinin A.The. part of the funds required by the latter in the amount of 32,000,000 rubles. At the same time, Ryabinin A.The. and Kozlov V.V. , acting within the framework of a general criminal intent aimed at seizing and stealing money by deceiving Glyadelkina S.AND. in the amount of 32,000,000 rubles, i.e. on an especially large scale, despite all the measures taken by them, they could not bring the crime to an end due to circumstances beyond their control, since the victim, not being sure that this amount will ultimately be received by these persons, fearing the loss of money, from the possibility of transferring them through Khubutia M.M. refused.
At the same time, having bowed Glyadelkin S.I. to the need to transfer them material values, approximately in July 2009, while in the city of Moscow, Ryabinin A.The. instructed Kozlov V.V. organize the registration of the transfer of ownership of real estate (non-residential premises at the above address) in favor of Ya.A. Ryabinina At the same time, acting in accordance with the general plan of the crime , by prior agreement and together with Ryabinin A.The. , Kozlov V.V. being in the city of Moscow, in the period from 07/03/2009 to 11/20/2009, he organized the receipt from Ya.A. Ryabinina. the necessary documents for registration of ownership of non-residential premises and their submission to the Office of the Federal Service for State Registration, Cadastre and Cartography in the city of Moscow in the Central Administrative District. On the basis of these documents, on November 26, 2009, an entry was made in the Unified State Register of Rights to Real Estate and Transactions with it about the ownership of Ya.A. Ryabinina. for non-residential premises with an area of202.5 sq.m. , located at the address: Moscow, st. Bakhrushina, d. 13 . Thus it is Ryabinin A.The. , A.V. , acting by a group of persons in a preliminary conspiracy, together with V.V. Kozlov. , in the period from May to December 2009, in the city of Moscow, using his official position, by deception and abuse of trust, he attempted to steal money S.I. Gliadelkina. in the amount of 32,000,000 rubles ...
Actions Ryabinin A.The. and Kozlova V.V. the consequence is qualified for h. 4 tbsp. 159 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.
The fact of the appeal of Ryabinin A.The. with a statement about allegedly committed against him by S.AND.Glyadelkin. crime, the investigation is regarded as one of the stages of the implementation of criminal intent, aimed at concealing the true illegal intentions, an attempt to avoid prosecution, to put forward a version of the defense, discrediting the applicant Glyadelkina S.AND. , and hide your involvement in the crime. In view of the above, in the actions of Ryabinin A.The. there are no signs of a crime under Art. 306 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Taking into account that Glyadelkin S.AND. 02.12.2009 acted within the framework of the Federal Law of 13.08.1995 No. 144 — FZ "On Operational Investigative Activities" and fulfilled the illegal requirements of A.The. and Kozlova V.The. on the transfer of property to them on an especially large scale, in his actions there are no signs of corpus delicti under Art. 291, 304 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. 24 ".
To be continued
Article source: “https://rucriminal.info/en/material/prishel-k-vice-meru-moskvy-s-sumkoy-s-dengami”